Mexico Energy Partners

Lower energy cost without disrupting production

Independent ASHRAE-aligned energy audits and implementation oversight for industrial and commercial facilities in Mexico. No equipment sales. No vendor commissions.

USD 324,500annual savings verified under IPMVP Option B, chemicals plant, Veracruz
14%lower energy intensity at the same plant
0vendor commissions
Request a preliminary assessment

No supplier contact. Confidential.

Verified over 18 months. Results vary by facility.

Confidential energy review

Share your contact details and current electricity supply. MEP replies by email with an initial assessment and the next step. Bills and plant data are requested only after that.

Enter your name.
Enter a valid work email.
Enter your company.
Enter a valid phone number.
Select your current supply.
Please accept the privacy notice.

Next step: MEP replies by email with an initial assessment. Bills and plant data are requested only after that.

Prefer email? Write to info@mexicoenergypartners.com

Energy waste creates cost, capacity and operating risk

Cost exposure

Tariff structure, demand peaks, operating schedules and equipment performance determine delivered energy cost. Under GDMTH, capacity is billed on maximum demand in the punta period, so one badly timed load can set the month's charge.

Capacity pressure

Hidden load growth and simultaneous equipment demand can force avoidable electrical and cooling investment. A new CFE transmission connection can take up to 25 months. Capacity recovered through efficiency is available now.

Operating risk

Unstable controls, poor power quality and deferred maintenance create production and reliability exposure. A power factor below 90% also draws a CFE surcharge (tariff provisions, DOF, October 31, 2000).

A credible audit connects all three to one measured baseline.

Large consumers now carry energy management obligations

Each of these depends on a measured energy baseline. An audit builds it once, in a form finance, operations and auditors can all use.

UPAC energy management

Sites that used more than 45 GWh of electricity, or 100,000 barrels of oil equivalent of fuel, in the prior year are UPAC. They must run an energy management system based on international standards such as ISO 50001 and report to CONUEE each year.

RENE emissions registry

Facilities above 25,000 tCO2e a year, counting emissions from purchased electricity, report to RENE each year, with third-party verification every three years.

NIS sustainability disclosure

Companies reporting under Mexican NIF disclose Scope 1 and 2 emissions and energy use under CINIF NIS standards, starting with fiscal 2025.

MEP provides advisory and specification support, not certification. CONUEE is preparing updated rules for 2027. References as of 19 September 2026. Verify current rules before relying on this page.

The capital decision sets the audit level

The audit is an investment decision, not a checklist. Scope is confirmed before fieldwork so the evidence matches the decision you need to make.

Level 1 diagnostic

Establish materiality

Bills, walkthrough, operating interviews and a prioritized opportunity screen.

Level 2 detailed audit

Build the finance case

Targeted measurement, engineering calculations, investment ranges and modeled savings.

Level 3 investment analysis

Prepare for execution

Detailed engineering evidence for complex measures, financing and final capital approval.

Request a preliminary assessmentNo supplier contact. Confidential.

Measure the loads that can change the decision

Engineer connecting a power quality analyzer to a locked-out electrical panel

Electrical baseline

Tariff, demand, interval profile, load factor and peak windows.

Major loads

HVAC, compressed air, motors, process equipment, lighting and controls.

Operating conditions

Schedules, setpoints, production requirements and maintenance state.

Implementation limits

Uptime, interfaces, safety, access, capital timing and approval ownership.

The recommendation is facility-specific and traceable to measured evidence.

Two engagements, two levels of evidence

MEP labels every figure by what stands behind it. Verified means measured under IPMVP after installation. Modeled means engineering estimates from the audit.

Verified

Chemicals plant, Veracruz coast

12 MW peak demand. Three measures: steam system, chiller and cooling tower, and a 499 kWp solar array.

USD 324,500annual savings verified under IPMVP Option B over 18 months
14%lower energy intensity
~1,415 tCO2eavoided each year

Client name withheld. Results vary by facility.

Modeled

Distribution center audit

The audit identified monitoring, HVAC fan drives, free cooling, compressed-air improvements and mezzanine lighting opportunities.

~USD 74,900identified investment across four quantified measures
~USD 30,900modeled annual savings
2.42 yearsblended simple payback
MeasureInvestment (USD)Annual savings (USD)Simple payback
Energy monitoring$32,100$8,9753.58 years
HVAC fan drives$3,940$8654.55 years
Free cooling$7,500$1,6354.59 years
Mezzanine LED lighting$31,350$19,4401.61 years

Modeled and identified results. Modeled reductions are about 87.3 tCO2e a year. Realized savings depend on final specifications, installation and operation. Compressed-air improvements remain a qualitative target pending a dedicated leak survey.

Implementation oversight protects the audit case

Audits stall after the report. In the US Department of Energy industrial assessment program, about a third of identified savings were realized, held back mostly by financing, ownership and plant constraints. MEP stays through award and commissioning.

Confirm

Revalidate conditions and prioritize measures.

Specify

Issue vendor-ready technical packages.

Procure

Run the bidder process and normalize offers.

Commission

Verify installed performance and handover.

Installation windows and site access are coordinated with operating and production schedules.

One record aligns three stakeholder decisions

Finance

Investment case

Baseline, cash flow, payback, retained risks and expected net benefit.

Procurement

Comparable bids

Vendor scope, qualified bidders, normalized offers, warranty and award rationale.

Engineering

Executable basis

Measured conditions, interfaces, acceptance criteria and commissioning record.

The same evidence carries from recommendation through award, installation and verification.

MEP remains independent through implementation

0equipment sales relationships
0vendor commissions
Clientpays all MEP advisory fees

Recommendations are evaluated against facility requirements. MEP has no economic interest in which contractor, supplier or equipment brand is selected.

Independence is a governance control.

What plant and finance teams ask first

Will the audit disrupt production?

No shutdown is required. Measurements are scheduled around production windows, and access, safety and uptime limits are agreed before fieldwork starts.

What should we send first?

Your contact details, the plant location, the type of operation and the cost or decision you want to quantify. That is enough for MEP to make an initial assessment and recommend the audit level. Bills, interval data, equipment lists and schedules are requested after that.

How do Level 1, 2 and 3 audits differ?

Level 1 tells you whether the opportunity is material. Level 2 builds the finance case with measurement and engineering calculations. Level 3 adds the engineering detail needed for complex measures and final capital approval.

Does the UPAC obligation apply to our site?

It applies to sites that used more than 45 GWh of electricity, or more than 100,000 barrels of oil equivalent of fuel, in the prior year. CONUEE is preparing updated rules for 2027. MEP checks your position from your consumption data.

Who installs the measures?

Qualified contractors selected through a competitive bid that MEP runs for you. MEP sells no equipment and takes no commissions, so the award follows your requirements.

Are savings guaranteed?

No. MEP reports modeled savings as modeled and verified savings only when measured under IPMVP. Every figure in the audit states its assumptions and retained risks.

Begin with a confidential energy review

Share your contact details and current electricity supply. MEP replies by email, confirms the plant location, the type of operation and the cost or decision you want to quantify, and names the audit level that matches it. Bills and plant data are requested after the initial assessment.

No supplier contact. Confidential.

Finance lead reviewing a CFE bill next to an interval load profile

Request a preliminary assessment

Share your contact details and current electricity supply. MEP replies by email with an initial assessment and the next step. Bills and plant data are requested only after that.

Enter your name.
Enter a valid work email.
Enter your company.
Enter a valid phone number.
Select your current supply.
Please accept the privacy notice.

Next step: MEP replies by email with an initial assessment. Bills and plant data are requested only after that.

Prefer email? Write to info@mexicoenergypartners.com

Request a preliminary assessment